EN

Translate:

  • Home
  • Menu
    • FAQ's
    • Class Requirements
    • Performance Videos
    • Workbooks
    • About Us
    • Learn Music With Us
    • Benefits of Music
    • Is My Child Ready?
    • Gallery
    • Tuition
    • Economist's View
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Home
    • Menu
      • FAQ's
      • Class Requirements
      • Performance Videos
      • Workbooks
      • About Us
      • Learn Music With Us
      • Benefits of Music
      • Is My Child Ready?
      • Gallery
      • Tuition
      • Economist's View
    • Contact Us

EN

  • Home
  • Menu
    • FAQ's
    • Class Requirements
    • Performance Videos
    • Workbooks
    • About Us
    • Learn Music With Us
    • Benefits of Music
    • Is My Child Ready?
    • Gallery
    • Tuition
    • Economist's View
  • Contact Us

Music Lessons from an Economist's Point of View

By Vicky Barham, Ph. D.


I’m a parent of children enrolled in Suzuki music lessons. I’d like

to explain to other parents why I feel – quite strongly, actually –

that it is unreasonable of we parents to expect our teachers to make

up lessons we miss, even if I know as well as they do just how

expensive lessons are, and, equally importantly, how important that

weekly contact is with the teacher to keeping practising ticking

along smoothly. I think that it is natural for we parents to share

the point of view that students should have their missed lessons

rescheduled, but if we were to ‘walk a mile’ in our teachers’ shoes,

we might change our minds about what it is reasonable for us to

expect of our teachers.


Like many parents, I pay in advance for lessons each term. In my

mind, what this means is that I have reserved a regular spot in the

busy schedules of my sons’ teachers. I understand – fully – that if I

can’t make it to the lesson one week (perhaps my son is sick, or we

are away on holiday, or there is some other major event at school)

then we will pay for the lesson, but that my teacher is under no

obligation to find another spot for me that week, or to refund me for

the untaught lesson. And this is the way it should be.

In my ‘other life’ I am an economist and teach at our local

university. Students pay good money to attend classes at the

university; but if they don’t come to my lecture on a Monday morning,

then I am not going to turn around and deliver them a private

tutorial on Tuesday afternoon. When I go to the store and buy

groceries, I may purchase something that doesn’t get used. Days or

months later, I end up throwing it out. I don’t get a refund from the

grocery store for the unused merchandise. If I sign my child up for

swimming lessons at the local pool, and s/he refuses to return after

the first lesson, I can’t get my money back. So there are lots of

situations in our everyday lives where we regularly pay in advance

for goods or some service, and if we end up not using what we have

purchased, we have to just ‘swallow our losses’. On the other hand,

if I purchase an item of clothing, and get home and change my mind, I

can take it back and expect either a refund or a store credit.

So why do I believe that music lessons fall into the first category of

‘non-returnable merchandise’, rather than into the second case

of ‘exchange privileges unlimited’ (which I think is one of the

advertising slogans of an established women’s clothing store!)?

Speaking now as an economist, I would claim that the reason is that

items like clothing are “durable goods’ – meaning, they can be

returned and then resold at the original price – whereas music

lessons are non-durable goods – meaning, once my Monday slot at 3:30

is gone, my son’s teacher can’t turn around and sell it again. The

only way she would be able to give him a lesson later in the week

would be if she were to give up time that she had scheduled for her

own private life; and that seems pretty unreasonable – I can’t think

of many employees who would be thrilled if their bosses were to

announce that they couldn’t work from 3:30 to 4:30 this afternoon,

but would they please stay until 6:30 on Thursday, because there will

be work for them then!


Many teachers hesitate to refuse our request to shift lesson times

(because our busy schedules *do* change), because unless they keep us

parents happy, we will decide to take our child somewhere else for

lessons (or to drop musical study), and they will lose part of their

income. This is particularly true in areas with lower average income,

where it can be particularly difficult to find students. So rather

than telling us that ‘well, actually, the only time when I’m not

teaching and that you can bring your son for lesson is during the

time I set aside each week to go for a long soul-cleansing walk, and

I *can’t* do that on Monday at 3:30 when you should have turned up’,

they agree to teach us at a time that really doesn’t suit their

schedule. Teachers who are ‘nice’ in this way often, in the long run,

end up exhausted, and feeling exploited; they try to draw a line in

the sand. However, too few parents ask to switch only when absolutely

necessary, and too many parents want lesson times when it suits them

this week, which is not the same time that suited last week. The only

time that I would feel entitled to discuss shifting a lesson time is

if the reason I can’t make the lesson is because (i) I have to do

something for the Suzuki school and the only time at which that other

event can happen is during my lesson time; (ii) my teacher were to

ask us to participate in some other activity (e.g., orchestra, etc.)

and that other activity were to create the conflict. If the conflict

arises because my child is in the School play, and they have their

dress-rehearsal during his lesson time, then I feel that I must

choose between the two activities, and if he attends the dress

rehearsal my private lesson teacher doesn’t owe me anything.

During May, my eldest son will be missing three lessons because he is

going to accompany me on a trip to New Zealand to visit his great-

grandparents. I do not expect my son’s teacher to refund me for those

missed lessons, or to reschedule them by ‘doubling up’ lessons in the

weeks before or after our departure. Since there will be lots of

advanced notice, I might ask her to consider preparing a

special ‘practice tape’ for that period, or to answer my questions

via e-mail, but if she doesn’t have the time (the second half of

April is going to be really busy for her, and she wouldn’t be able to

do the tape until more or less the week we left) and so has to

refuse, then that’s fine. I certainly don’t expect her to credit me

with three make-up lessons; there is no way for her to find a student

to fill a three-week hole in her schedule during our absence.

Instead, I hope that she will enjoy the extra hour of rest during

those three weeks, and that we will all feel renewed enthusiasm when

we return to lessons at the end of the trip.


Article Copyright © 2001Vicky Barham

Vicky Barham, Ph. D., is the mother of two children who are enrolled

in Suzuki music lessons in Canada. She also teaches Economics at the

University of Ottawa. The TMTA webmasters became acquainted with Dr.

Barham through the Internet and were so impressed with her sound and

logical expressions about music teaching that we asked permission to

publish her ideas for all to share. 

Copyright © 2018 Yellow Jacket Studio - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by